<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Physics on Sylvia Mirecki</title>
    <link>http://elijah.mirecki.com/categories/physics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Physics on Sylvia Mirecki</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 21:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://elijah.mirecki.com/categories/physics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>No, we don&#39;t live in a simulated universe. Ruliad!? That&#39;s more like it!</title>
      <link>http://elijah.mirecki.com/blog/simulated-universe-rebuttal/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 21:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://elijah.mirecki.com/blog/simulated-universe-rebuttal/</guid>
      <description>Introduction Once in a while, you hear someone propose &amp;ldquo;maybe our universe is in a (computer) simulation&amp;rdquo;. It goes something along the lines of &amp;ldquo;we can already basically simulate the universe, so it&amp;rsquo;s not a stretch to assume we&amp;rsquo;re in a simulation&amp;rdquo;.&#xA;That&amp;rsquo;s absurd. In this post, I&amp;rsquo;ll rebut the idea from several perspectives.&#xA;1. The Principle of Parsimony indicates we&amp;rsquo;re not actively running in a simulation The Ruliad is defined as &amp;ldquo;the result of following all possible computational rules in all possible ways&amp;rdquo;.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
